Something no one seemed to comment upon until much much later... at least not that I found while gathering this junk... is that those emails that Angela Hoy shared were four years old and show a clear pattern of self interest and irresponsibility on the part of the site owner who refused to do anything about it. Now, if that sort of thing was going on four years ago and has continued until today and will continue until someone does have the funds to take the site owner to court... how can you honestly say that the offending person is honest about anything or very trustworthy? How many others have been wrongly maligned in the past? How do we know that anything that's stated for fact on *that* site is true when the site owner admits to untruths, when caught, but refuses to do anything about them?
I found it a courageous thing for Ms. Hoy to share those emails after all this time, especially given the temperament of the other people involved. Instead, you crucified her because she tried to make you see when you wish to remain blind. To repeat a quote from the beginning of these pages: " Some people are just not smart enough to be allowed to run loose on the Internet."
At the end of that screenshot, Anonymous said, "... instantly sides with the hosting company (w/o asking any questions it seems)" How do you know she didn't ask any questions? Because she didn't share the information with a lynch mob? That doesn't mean she didn't know what she was doing or tell anyone else about what she knew. Just because you choose to remain blind doesn't mean everyone else chooses the same.